Education for 21st Century Jobs
Aiming for a Moving Target

<strong>Education for 21<sup>st</sup> Century Jobs</strong><br><em>Aiming for a Moving Target</em>

The United States pioneered universal free primary education to provide literacy to its newly enfranchised citizens. We flourished. It then led the world in the industrial era on the strength of the free high schools that provided skills to build the corporations and factories which dominated. Again we flourished. Next, the GI Bill was created to educate 8 million veterans returning from World War II to resume our lead in industry and begin the transition to a service economy. And, of course, we flourished again. The question now becomes what sort of education do we need for this century and particularly, to create high quality, high wage jobs at scale.

What Doesn’t Work: Two decades in, we appear to be on the wrong track. The drive to improve schools as measured by heavy use of standardized testing has seemingly backfired. Ushered in by the No Child Left Behind legislation of 2001, schools at both the elementary and secondary levels were tasked with making substantial improvements in the performance of their students as measured by fourteen separate tests of math, science, and reading. Failure to improve led to the firings of principals and teachers and, ultimately, to the shuttering of non-performing schools.

Because very little progress has been made since its passing, the No Child Left Behind legislation was absorbed and modified by subsequent initiatives such as the Common Core. However, the emphasis on standardized testing continues, accompanied by the need to “teach to the test” where teachers religiously prep their students at the expense of actual learning time.

The emphasis on standardization and high stakes testing was done with laudable intentions to better prepare graduates for college and jobs in a near-future economy. The problem is that the future state is unfolding rapidly, driven in part by disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence and robotics. These technologies are eroding openings in both high wage professions such as medicine and engineering as well as the semi-skilled, routinized labor in factories and even commercial kitchens. Studies done by respected authorities such as Oxford University and McKinsey forecast up to 50% of jobs will be at risk of being automated away in the next one to two decades.

The fragile nature of the job market has been exposed by the rapidity in which the US economy shed 30 million jobs in response to the coronavirus, thereby eclipsing the losses of the Great Recession.  Most of these jobs were in hospitality, restaurants, bars, and retail stores with wages at the bottom end of the scale, so much so that the average wage actually rose for those still working.

The American labor force consisted of 160 million jobs before the virus hit out of a population of 330 million. Our labor force participation rate was 63.5%, a relatively low number – down by 4% from 20 years ago – which likely indicates that more people would enter if good jobs presented themselves.  The virus has reduced the participation rate further by 2% so that the hill to climb to full employment is daunting. The problem becomes more challenging when most of the new jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics are low wage, low skill requirements:

Job TitleExisting  2018To Be Added by 2028Med Annual Wage
Personal Care Aides2,241,000881,000$26,880
Home Health Aides831,000305,000$25,330
Cooks, Restaurant1,362,000299,000$27,290
Software Developers944,000241,500$105,590
Medical Assistants687,000155,000$34,800

Software developers, often seen as one of the most desirable professions, represent less than 1% in both today’s jobs and into 2028.  It is the only job typically requiring a four-year degree, even though there are many examples of excellent technologists that thrived without one, as highlighted by one well-known college dropout, Bill Gates.

The effect of the coronavirus burdens the challenge to get back to full employment populated by higher-wage jobs. The long slow recovery from the Great Recession was exacerbated by businesses getting “leaner and meaner” during the downturn, making full use of the technologies they deployed leading up to the crisis. Executives seldom take staff reductions in good times but look very hard at measures in slow periods. This process is no doubt underway currently in larger companies and is potentially compounded in small business. McKinsey & Co forecasts that the recovery for small businesses may take up to five years. Many owner/operators are reportedly choosing retirement rather than virtually starting over to re-open.

Where to Start: Educating Kids for Good Careers. Unsurprisingly, the clearest path to success is to obtain a college degree, as shown in this table:

 High School4 Year CollegeNotes/Sources
Unemployment Rate10.8%8.1%FRED July 2020
Median Wage/Week$712$1173BLS 2017
Household Wealth$77,000$229,000St Louis Fed 2017

The story, however, is more complicated:

  • Students who major in studio arts or Hibernian culture will not capture the same returns on their tuition investment as those who sat through boring accounting courses.
  • Students who start out pursuing a four-year degree but do not obtain one have little to show for their efforts but a mound of debt and no real advantage in the job market. Their wages are slightly higher than high school graduates but they actually have less wealth.
  • Graduates frequently feel underemployed and unable to use the skills they gained in college. 40% of recent graduates started in jobs that did not require a degree with a negative effect on their long term economic success.
  • High School graduates who pursue vocations that typically require certification but not multi-year degrees can earn like their college peers. But these jobs, while growing well at an above-average rate of 12% versus only .5% overall, are still just 1% of the workforce.

For the two-thirds of American adults who lack four-year degrees, prospects are increasingly grim, as evident in the Deaths of Despair that have shortened the lifespan for white, non-college-educated males in this country. High wage manufacturing jobs, historically unionized, have shrunk from 30% to 7% of the workforce. Our manufacturing output has actually risen while employment has declined due to off-shoring of components and automation.

If – potentially as a result of the pandemic – we bring manufacturing jobs back, the share of semi-skilled factory labor will most likely be small and relentlessly chased by robots whose average wage can be computed today at $5 per hour and dropping. A few highly skilled engineers and certified technicians will be all that is required, fulfilling the fevered vision of Kurt Vonnegut in Player Piano, published seventy years ago. In subsequent posts, we will explore if and how kids without degrees can stay ahead of the job terminators.

 Automation will be an indirect threat in the form of stiff competition versus traditional businesses. Entry-level jobs in retail sales were stagnant due to the continued expansion of eCommerce and then decimated during the quarantine. These trends will drastically reduce the opportunity for many kids with limited options to enter the workforce.

Given these challenges, what should our schools do? These options present themselves:

  1. Dominate the Knowledge Economy – the aggregate of innovative enterprises primarily in the STEM fields such as Apple, Google, Pfizer, and Tesla
  2. Prepare for the Gig Economy in which tens of millions find themselves entrepreneurs of their own personal start-up, intentionally or otherwise. For our purposes, this will include Uber drivers but also construction workers and related fields that don’t have stable weekly compensation.
  3. Prepare for a Post-Work Economy – as suggested by John Maynard Keynes in which we will live a comfortable middle-class existence working only 15 hours per week
  4. Establish an equitable Starting Line for the kids who are getting left behind, an increasingly large number of Caucasian, Black, and Hispanic students.

We will explore each of these options more thoroughly in future posts.

About The Prometheus Endeavor

Our mission is to apply our knowledge and management experience to further the IT and Digital Endeavors of society, its institutions, and businesses. The Prometheus Endeavor does not do consulting or represent vendors. For over 30 years, members have advised and managed some of the most successful deployments of IT.

Author

8 Comments

  1. This is familiar material for folks who teach in non-traditional colleges and universities. Here at Golden Gate University we follow a practitioner model that utilizes many adjuncts, who are practicing SME’s, to bring their expertise into the classroom. For four years running, U.S. News & World Report has ranked us #1 for adult learners, the 12% of the population that you indicate is left-out. Important student groups you do not mention are the vets from our armed forces. We are proud to enroll our veteran population in our graduate schools because they bring discipline, focus, leadership, organizational skills, and the desire to succeed that many traditional college grads are not getting in the traditional undergrad experience. Certainly, there is still a need for the traditional and valuable undergrad on-campus experience. Many of us “grew-up” in that environment, but the real world now also needs people with additional life-skills.

    One more thing. Until we recognize technology as a complement and enabler of the work force and not as a job-destroyer, we will be at the mercy of the naysayers. Every university program should include technology and position it as a necessary tool.

    • View Only

      Judy,
      Thank you for your thoughtful comment. Adult education is crucial particularly given how knowledge driven sectors of the economy like technology and pharmaceuticals are reinventing themselves every three to five years. And because it appears we will all undergo multiple career changes like the veterans you cite.
      At the risk of being a naysayer, I do see technology decimating jobs for people in low to semi-skilled areas like retail sales where the corona virus has hastened the bankruptcy of classic brands and shuttered malls. Also more advanced areas such as legal work, where on line research has dampened opportunities. This threat should be countered by the emphasis on technology that you mentioned.
      A final thought, as someone who has 2.5 degrees and exposure to many businesses as well as the college and university worlds, your point about bringing in subject matter experts with real world know how is crucial for adult learners.

  2. Rick Hardin

    You point out vexing challenge Bill for us at both the societal level and for individual institutions and leaders in education. There is so much current confusion and limbo status with changing Covid rules AND simultaneously considerable experimentation and progress with some great new ideas. (See for example the Porter piece here at Prometheus Endeavor re colleges). https://www.prometheusendeavor.org/so-many-experiments-so-what-are-we-learning/
    As you point out we won’t be able to move the needle meaningful on any of these fronts without meaning ACTION on the job & education/training fronts. Who are the decision makers who can make the strategic choices you outline? What support do they require to move from Op-Ed perspectives to real life effective programs and actions?
    Beginning to catalog real, practical success stories seems like one direction with promise.

  3. Bill Kelvie

    You are right: Covid appears to be causing significant learning loss in students, up to 30% before the fall term started. It also is immersing schools in a great experiment of on-line learning. A first bold step that decision makers could take is to suspend standardized testing…and then eliminate it. This includes SAT’s and ACT’s.
    Standardized testing follows an industrialized model of memorization and rote learning that has been obsoleted by Google. Freeing up teachers from teaching to the test would permit them to adjust more quickly to the closing of physical classrooms. It would also spare kids from being penalized for their school system’s failure to adapt quickly.

  4. Anonymous

    I like that first bold step suggestion Bill. It does raise however (not to “yes, but” this) – the question of performance accountability on the part of teachers and schools. If there are no standard tests — how do we go about ensuring strong teacher performance, rewarding excellent ones, separating out the poorer performers?

  5. I like that first bold step suggestion Bill. It does raise however (not to “yes, but” this) – the question of performance accountability on the part of teachers and schools. If there are no standard tests — how do we go about ensuring strong teacher performance, rewarding excellent ones, separating out the poorer performers?

  6. Bill Kelvie

    It is almost unbelievable that American students take up to 112 standardized tests during their pre-k through grade 12 education. Finland has one of the world’s most admired school systems and has only one round for high school seniors. The testing regimen in the US could be dramatically scaled back while maintaining some level of accountability and freeing up more valuable time to actually teach.
    Accountability for teacher performance could and should rest with school principals, who are in turn responsible to district management.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *